German ZEW Index Drops Significantly

Investor sentiment in Germany - as recorded in the ZEW index fell for the ninth straight month in October, dipping to its lowest level in over 13 years. I have really nothging more to say at this stage, this was all soooo predictable. For a good example of someone who saw it coming try Claus Vistesen (and here , and here).

Well, here we go:

The Mannheim-based economic think tank said its economic expectations indicator for Germany, based on a survey of 298 analysts and institutional investors, fell to -27.4 from -22.2 in September.

That was lower than the -20 reading expected by economists in a Reuters poll and the weakest level since March 1993. The euro slipped briefly against the U.S. dollar in response to the figures.

ZEW President Wolfgang Franz said rising orders and lower oil prices should have helped the indicator in October.

“Economic expectations were, however, overshadowed by a possible cooling of the U.S. economy, by a likely further rise in ECB interest rates and above all by the decreased consumer buying power through the VAT increase and other tax measures n 2007,” Franz noted.

The poor sentiment reading came amid growing optimism about 2006 growth in Europe’s largest economy.

Productivity In Europe

As was to be expected the rate of productivity increase in the US now seems to be slowing somewhat. Maintaining the rate of increase means maintaning the pace of a technological and organisational revolution, and it isn't immediately obvious that this is always possible (hence all those arguments about whether the cruising speed of the US economy had been raised in the long term or not).

On the other hand Europe is now catching up somewhat in the productivity game:

``Labor productivity, the holy grail of economic welfare and stock-market performance, has significantly accelerated,'' says Eric Chaney, Morgan Stanley's chief European economist in London and a former forecaster at the French Ministry of Finance.

Morgan Stanley economists calculate that productivity increased in the dozen euro nations at an annual rate of 2.6 percent in the first half of 2006, double the pace of the prior six years.

So while tyhere is obviously a first mover advantage with new technology, there is also a second mover 'catch-up' advantage if the pioneer doesn't keep moving forward. This is what we may now be seeing. Over a longer period of time there is absolutely no reason whatsoever that the EU economies cannot find ways to leverage ICT just like in the US, who have, at the end of the day, shown the others the way.

What the macro economic implications of this will be is another matter altogether. Here I don't go with the Bloomberg reading at all, but this is for another post.

Eurozone: One More Indicator To Add To The List

The Royal Bank of Scotland services index fell yesterday to 56.7, a 10-month low, from 57.4 in August. As Bloomberg wryly note, this is the biggest part of the economy. In that sense people may have been far too focused on industry and construction.

Growth in European service industries such as telecommunications and banking, the biggest part of the economy, slowed more than forecast in September after borrowing costs and unemployment climbed.

With interest rates increasing, a planned tax rise in Germany and a U.S. slowdown clouding the outlook, the International Monetary Fund expects euro-area growth to slow to 2 percent next year from 2.4 percent in 2006. Unemployment in the dozen countries sharing the euro rose in August for the first time in almost three years, a report showed yesterday.

One more little finicky detail, oil is falling, but if the economies didn't slow *that* much as it rose, then that does provide some sort of context for thinking about how much benefit we will see as it falls. My feeling is that many people seem to be challenged when they have to think about more than one thing at a time. Oil fell yesterday, and stocks rose. But if oil fell because growth was looking weaker for 2007, why should this be good news for stocks? I would be watching what happens next in the equity markets.

Quandry At The ECB

Last week I suggested that the global interest raising cycle may now have peaked. There is an important caveat to this: we may still see one more rise from the ECB this Thursday. (the graphic and the comments below come from the linked FT article by Ralph Atkins).

The ECB really are faced with a hard dilema. They seem to believe that growth in the eurozone is fairly sustainable - even though they recognise that 2007 will not be a strong growth year - and are anxious to raise the level of their refi rate in the longer term. Eurozone politicians, however, undoubtedly see things differently:

How high will the European Central Bank dare to go? Barring upsets, the ECB will announce another quarter percentage point rise, to 3.25 per cent, in its main interest rate on Thursday after its governing council meets in the Banque de France’s imposing Paris building – one of its twice-yearly meetings outside of Frankfurt.

By central bank standards, this will be almost an act of provocation. French politicians, such as Thierry Breton, finance minister, have been among the noisiest in urging the ECB not to jeopardise growth prospects in the 12-country eurozone by raising rates.

The issue is complicated by two factors:

i) The inherent difficulty in running a 'one size fits all policy' for a collection of economies with very different underlying fundamentals.

ii) The obsession the ECB has with the idea that liquidity conditions in the zone are excessively lax (an argument which has been being strongly pushed by MS economist Joaquim Fels who seems to now be pretty influential in Frankfurt):

The ECB can certainly find reasons to push interest rates significantly higher. Credit and money supply figures are flashing red alarm signals: M3, the broad money measure it (unlike other central banks) regards as a good longer-term inflation indicator, remains close to the highest levels seen since the 1999 launch of the euro.

ECB interest rates may be some way from a “natural” rate – judged by economists to be consistent with an economy running at full capacity without generating higher inflation. Estimates occasionally cited by the ECB suggest that the eurozone’s inflation-adjusted natural rate is between 2 per cent and 3 per cent, implying nominal rates (adding inflation) should go as high as 5 per cent.

Caution is likely to be the ECB’s watchword, however. Joachim Fels, economist at Morgan Stanley, argues that the inflation-adjusted natural interest rate might have fallen by a percentage point to around 1.5 per cent in the past decade because of structural changes in the economy and increased central bank credibility.

In practice, such uncertainties make the ECB reluctant to attach much weight to natural interest rate estimates. It prefers to take decisions based on an assessment of medium-term price pressures.


I think Fels exaggerates the underlying inflation problem (although clearly we will all have to learn to live with higher trend energy and commodity prices). Inherent weaknesses will still tend to limit the 'pass through' process, although this will vary from one economy to another. Undoubtedly some zone economies - Ireland, Spain, Greece - have a significant inflation problem, but how do you address this while catering for the needs of those economies with a long run growth challenge (Italy, Germany). Difficult decisions, and what happens on Thursday will be well worth watching.

More Signs The Eurozone Is Slowing

Todays eurozone unemployemnt figures - unemployment across the zone rose very slightly - appear to be consistent with the idea that the economies are slowing:

Unemployment in the dozen countries sharing the euro increased in August from a record low as signs of a slowdown in the global economy prompted companies to curtail hiring.

The jobless rate rose for the first time since November 2003, increasing to 7.9 percent from 7.8 percent in July, the European Union's statistics office in Luxembourg said today. Inflation at the wholesale level slowed in August as energy prices declined, the office said in a separate report.

``The downward trend in the unemployment rate that began in 2004 appears to have stabilized,'' said Dominic Bryant, an economist at BNP Paribas in London.